SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (53)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Measuring Securities Market Efficiency in the Regulatory Setting

James F. Cotter
Wake Forest University Calloway School

Randall S. Thomas
Vanderbilt University - School of Law



Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 63, p. 105, 2000
Vanderbilt Law School, Joe C. Davis Working Paper No. 99-14

Abstract:     
In the "Aircraft Carrier," the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed changes in federal securities disclosure requirements in an attempt to enhance and facilitate the process of issuing new securities. Under the proposed regulatory regime, the registration process would be simplified so that many larger, more experienced issuers would be able to use a new, shorter registration statement called Form B (as opposed to the more extensive Form A) whenever they sell securities to the public. To qualify to use Form B, a company with at least twelve months reporting history under the Exchange Act must either have a public float of $75 million or more and an average daily trading volume (ADTV) of $1 million or more, or have a public float of $250 million or more.

In this paper, we argue that the SEC's study of capital market efficiency employs too broad a definition of what constitutes "an analyst" who represents an important conduit for information between a company and its investors. We adjust the definition of an analyst to more accurately reflect only those analysts whose research effectively disseminates information to investors in the market (sell-side analysts) and find that the proposed numerical cutoffs for the use of Form B are set much too low to insure adequate analyst following. This finding is consistent with evidence we present that a substantial percentage of companies eligible to use Form B have low levels of institutional investor shareholdings.

Based on a sample of companies whose stock price was greater than $1.00 on 12/31/99, we find that 3,413 (43.3%) of firms in the sample qualify to file Form B using the SEC's proposed numerical cutoffs. Using First Call's consensus earnings estimate service, we examine the analyst following of firms that have a market capitalization greater than $250 million and find that 26.1% of these firms have less than three analysts compared to the 5.0% reported by the SEC. We also examine the SEC's second criteria (market capitalization greater than $75 million and average daily trading volume (ADTV) of $1 million) and find that 38.1% of companies have less than three analysts compared to the 14.0% reported by the SEC. We argue that equity or sell-side analyst following represents an important source of information to investors and should be considered when establishing criteria for relaxed reporting requirements when companies issue securities.

JEL Classifications: K2, K22

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 05, 2000 ; Last revised: June 12, 2009

Suggested Citation

Cotter, James F. and Thomas, Randall S., Measuring Securities Market Efficiency in the Regulatory Setting (March 2000). Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 63, p. 105, 2000; Vanderbilt Law School, Joe C. Davis Working Paper No. 99-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=219876 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.219876


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Randall S. Thomas (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - School of Law ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
James F. Cotter
Wake Forest University Calloway School ( email )
P.O. Box 7659
Winston-Salem, NC 27109-7659
United States
336-758-7220 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,252
Downloads: 401
Download Rank: 19,181
Footnotes: 53

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds.