Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2199016
 
 

Footnotes (217)



 


 



War is Governance: Explaining the Logic of the Laws of War from a Principal-Agent Perspective


Eyal Benvenisti


Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law

Amichai Cohen


Ono Academic College - Faculty of Law; Israel Democracy Institute

January 10, 2013

Michigan Law Review, 2013

Abstract:     
What is the purpose of the international law on armed conflict, and why would opponents bent on destroying each other’s capabilities commit to and obey rules designed to limit their choice of targets, weapons and tactics? Traditionally, answers to this question have been offered on the one hand by moralists who regard the law as being inspired by morality, and on the other by realists who explain this branch of law on the basis of reciprocity. Neither side's answers withstand close scrutiny. In this Article we develop an alternative explanation which is based on the principal-agent model of domestic governance. We pry open the black box of "the state," and examine the complex interaction between the civilian and military apparatuses seething beneath the veil of sovereignty. Our point of departure is that military conflicts raise significant intra-state conflicts of interest that result from the delegation of authority to engage in combat: between civil society and elected officials, between elected officials and military commanders, and within the military chain of command. We submit that the most effective way to reduce domestic agency costs prevalent in war is by relying on external resources to monitor and discipline the agents. Even though it may be costly, and reciprocity is not assured, principals who worry that agency slack may harm them or their nations' interests are likely to prefer that warfare be regulated by international norms. The Article expounds the theory and uses it to explain the evolution of the law and its specific doctrines, and outlines the normative implications of this new understanding of the purpose of the law. Ultimately, our analysis suggests that, as a practical matter, international law enhances the ability of states to amass huge armies, because it lowers the costs of controlling them. Therefore, although at times compliance with the law may prove costly in the short run, in the long run it strengthens the state against its enemies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: law of armed conflict, international humanitarian law, principal-agent relations, history of international law

JEL Classification: K33, N40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 11, 2013 ; Last revised: March 13, 2013

Suggested Citation

Benvenisti, Eyal and Cohen, Amichai, War is Governance: Explaining the Logic of the Laws of War from a Principal-Agent Perspective (January 10, 2013). Michigan Law Review, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2199016 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199016

Contact Information

Eyal Benvenisti (Contact Author)
Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978
Israel
Amichai Cohen
Ono Academic College - Faculty of Law ( email )
104 Zahal St.
Kiryat Ono, 55000
Israel
Israel Democracy Institute ( email )
4 Pinsker St.
Jerusalem
Israel
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,032
Downloads: 220
Download Rank: 82,191
Footnotes:  217

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds