Discouraging Election Contests
Joshua A. Douglas
University of Kentucky - College of Law
January 11, 2013
University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 47, 2013
This brief article offers a few proposals for discouraging losing candidates from contesting the certified result of an election. Our system encourages – or at least does not dissuade – the filing of post-election contests in close races. But election contests are often bad for our democracy, as they can harm the ideals of finality, certainty, and legitimacy of the election process – with little tangible benefit given that most election contests fail, at least at the federal and statewide level. The article suggests three possible disincentives to initiating post-election litigation: we could eliminate any possibility for a candidate to challenge the certified result, require a large monetary filing fee or the posting of a high bond, or impose a public stigma on candidates who contest an election and lose. In the end, the goal of this article is to promote a broader discussion of the propriety of post-election litigation and what we can do to curtail it.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: election, election contest, disputed election, voting, post-election litigation, law of democracyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 12, 2013 ; Last revised: March 29, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds