Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2199631
 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



Discouraging Election Contests


Joshua A. Douglas


University of Kentucky - College of Law

January 11, 2013

University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 47, 2013

Abstract:     
This brief article offers a few proposals for discouraging losing candidates from contesting the certified result of an election. Our system encourages – or at least does not dissuade – the filing of post-election contests in close races. But election contests are often bad for our democracy, as they can harm the ideals of finality, certainty, and legitimacy of the election process – with little tangible benefit given that most election contests fail, at least at the federal and statewide level. The article suggests three possible disincentives to initiating post-election litigation: we could eliminate any possibility for a candidate to challenge the certified result, require a large monetary filing fee or the posting of a high bond, or impose a public stigma on candidates who contest an election and lose. In the end, the goal of this article is to promote a broader discussion of the propriety of post-election litigation and what we can do to curtail it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: election, election contest, disputed election, voting, post-election litigation, law of democracy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2013 ; Last revised: March 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Douglas, Joshua A., Discouraging Election Contests (January 11, 2013). University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 47, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2199631

Contact Information

Joshua A. Douglas (Contact Author)
University of Kentucky - College of Law ( email )
620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 563
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 215,755
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds