Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200269
 
 

Footnotes (101)



 


 



David Baldus and the Legacy of McCleskey v. Kemp


Samuel R. Gross


University of Michigan Law School

September 1, 2012

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, 2012
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 301

Abstract:     
In McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to racial discrimination in the use of the death penalty. That challenge was based on a landmark study of race and capital sentencing in the state of Georgia by the late Professor David Baldus and colleagues. The legal holding in McCleskey stands, despite the fact that the author of the opinion, Justice Lewis Powell, later renounced it in retirement. It is sometimes described as the Dred Scott decision of the twentieth century. But on the empirical question that was as stake in McCleskey, Baldus has prevailed. Neither the Court in McCleskey, nor any justice at the time or since, has disputed his factual conclusion that many defendants in Georgia were sentenced to death because of their race, and especially because of the race of the victims of the crimes for which they were convicted. This was a remarkable achievement. It fundamentally changed our understanding of the role of race in criminal justice in the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: criminal law, criminal procedure, death penalty, capital punishment, racial discrimination, Supreme Court, McCleskey v. Kemp, David Baldus

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 15, 2013 ; Last revised: January 19, 2013

Suggested Citation

Gross, Samuel R., David Baldus and the Legacy of McCleskey v. Kemp (September 1, 2012). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, 2012; U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 301. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200269

Contact Information

Samuel R. Gross (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-764-1519 (Phone)
734-764-8309 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 892
Downloads: 229
Download Rank: 79,521
Footnotes:  101

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds