Abstract

 


 



Redress for a No-Win Situation: Using Liquidated Damages in Comparable Coaches' Contracts to Assess a School's Economic Damage from the Loss of a Successful Coach


Richard T. Karcher


Florida Coastal School of Law

January 14, 2013

South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2012

Abstract:     
This essay addresses the difficulty of proving the financial harm that results when a head coach departs a college or university during the contract term and the institution thereby abruptly loses a valuable asset — a successful and stable athletic program. Due to the unique and specialized nature of head coaches’ services and the industry in which they work, ordinary measures for assessing damages based on substitute performance and transaction costs are insufficient. This essay offers a theory of measuring a university’s damages within the construct of a lost-income-producing-asset valuation, using a methodology based on liquidated damages amounts in comparable coaches’ contracts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: coaches' contracts, measuring university's damages

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Karcher, Richard T., Redress for a No-Win Situation: Using Liquidated Damages in Comparable Coaches' Contracts to Assess a School's Economic Damage from the Loss of a Successful Coach (January 14, 2013). South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200659

Contact Information

Richard T. Karcher (Contact Author)
Florida Coastal School of Law ( email )
8787 Baypine Rd.
Jacksonville, FL 32256
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 393
Downloads: 97
Download Rank: 139,409

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.266 seconds