|
||||
|
||||
Appointing the First Australian-Born Governor-General: Legal and Vice-Regal OppositionJohn WaughMelbourne Law School 2012 Public Law Review, Vol. 23, pp. 50, 2012 Abstract: Archival sources that have become available in recent years deepen our understanding of the controversy that surrounded the nomination in 1930 of Sir Isaac Isaacs as the first Australian-born Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. A chorus of elite Australian lawyers told King George V and the public that the appointment of Isaacs on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister would be invalid under the Australian Constitution. Their views, and those of other critics, were relayed by State Governors and the outgoing Governor-General, who added comments revealing their anti-Semitic hostility to Isaacs and their determination to oppose the appointment regardless of the views of the governments that advised them. For these lawyers, the imperial connection pervaded the Constitution, and only constitutional amendment could enable Australian ministers to become advisers of the King.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: Sir Isaac Isaacs, Governor-General, Australia, John Baird, Lord Stonehaven, James Scullin, Alexander Hore-Ruthven, Lord Gowrie Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 16, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.469 seconds