|
||||
|
||||
Opportunity Lost: The Supreme Court of Canada Misses a Historic Chance to Consider Question of Public Interest Standing for Animal InterestsPeter SankoffUniversity of Alberta - Faculty of Law January 16, 2013 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Forthcoming Abstract: The Supreme Court of Canada recently denied leave to appeal in Reece v. Edmonton (City), a 2-1 decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal, which focused on the right of private parties to seek judicial intervention on behalf of animals. In this article, solicited by the Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, I will examine what was lost by this decision to deny leave, explore the important questions that were at stake in the appeal, and suggest why the Supreme Court should have decided otherwise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7 Keywords: animal law, public interesting standing, supreme court of Canada, leave to appeal Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 19, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.078 seconds