Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201815
 
 

Footnotes (76)



 


 



Unilateral Exercises of Public Authority: Addressing Issues of Fairness in Teck v. Pakootas


Jaye Ellis


McGill University - Faculty of Law

April 16, 2011

Leiden Journal of International Law (2012) 25 (2)

Abstract:     
Teck v. Pakootas revisits the infamous Trail smelter, which made history in public international law. This more recent case should be set to make history as well, due to the manner in which the issue of extraterritorial exercise of jurisdiction was handled. The substantive result reached in the course seems fair, reasonable and appropriate: a notorious polluter, Teck Cominco Metals Inc., is called to account by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and required to study the feasibility of cleaning up a site it contaminated by dumping effluents in a transboundary river over the course of several decades. Yet both courts that examined this case on the merits failed to understand the ramifications of this extension of the EPA’s jurisdiction across the Canada-US border. This article begins with a doctrinal analysis of jurisdictional rules in private and public international law, and then proceeds to evaluate those rules with the help of insights from scholarship on global administrative law and international public authority.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: International environmental law, extraterritoriality, transnational law, global administrative law, international public authority, transboundary pollution

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Ellis, Jaye, Unilateral Exercises of Public Authority: Addressing Issues of Fairness in Teck v. Pakootas (April 16, 2011). Leiden Journal of International Law (2012) 25 (2). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201815

Contact Information

Jaye Ellis (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
514 398 6625 (Phone)
514 398 3233 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 172
Downloads: 31
Footnotes:  76

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds