Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201821
 


 



Empathic Dialogue: From Formalism to Value Principles


Mitchell F. Crusto


Loyola University New Orleans College of Law

2012

65 Southern Methodist University Law Review 845 (2012)
Loyola New Orleans Law Research Paper No. 2013-01

Abstract:     
In response to a recent call for heightened attention to judicial ethics and quality judicial decision making, this Article posits the idea that judges should engage in empathic dialogue, a judicial discipline, to achieve empathic constitutionality — a set of value choices that attend to the real world effects of their decisions on people. It seeks a paradigm shift from rights-neutral formalism to rights-focused value principles in federal courts. And it argues that especially during these economically challenging times, judges should assess their biases to minimize “blind injustice,” the unintended negative effects of their decisions and to achieve true justice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: constitutional law, jurisprudence, judicial empathy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2013 ; Last revised: March 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Crusto, Mitchell F., Empathic Dialogue: From Formalism to Value Principles (2012). 65 Southern Methodist University Law Review 845 (2012); Loyola New Orleans Law Research Paper No. 2013-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201821

Contact Information

Mitchell F. Crusto (Contact Author)
Loyola University New Orleans College of Law ( email )
7214 St. Charles Ave.
Campus Box 901
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
504-861-5743 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 283
Downloads: 49

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.468 seconds