Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201845
 


 



Coercive Plea Bargaining: The Unrecognized Scourge of the Justice System


Harry M. Caldwell


Pepperdine University - School of Law

2011

Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 829, 2011
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/06

Abstract:     
Part I of this Article briefly sets forth the ethical and professional duties of prosecutors. Part II examines the game-theory concepts at play in plea-and sentence-bargaining negotiations. For perspective, Part III explores the evolution of plea bargaining from common law and elucidates the problem of coercive plea bargaining. Part VI analyzes how other scholars' approaches fail to address the problem adequately and hence have not been implemented. Finally, in Part V, the Article concludes by offering a viable approach for limiting prosecutorial abuse in the charging process -- an approach that governments, both state and federal, can implement without disrupting the justice system and without significant costs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: prosecutors, game-theory, plea bargaining, coercive plea bargaining

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 17, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Caldwell, Harry M., Coercive Plea Bargaining: The Unrecognized Scourge of the Justice System (2011). Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 829, 2011; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201845

Contact Information

Harry M. Caldwell (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University - School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 339
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 143,069

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds