Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201903
 
 

Footnotes (324)



 


 



The Relational Nature of Privacy


Laurent Sacharoff


University of Arkansas School of Law

2012

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 1249, 2012
University of Arkansas Research Paper No. 13-08

Abstract:     
The hard Fourth Amendment cases, especially those involving surveillance, ask whether the police investigative tactic at issue counts as a “search”; if not, the Fourth Amendment does not apply at all. Under the Court’s main test, at least for surveillance without a trespass, the police conduct a “search” if they invade a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy.

But when the Court assesses Fourth Amendment privacy, it treats it as an all-or-nothing concept without regard to the relation between the person searched and the person searching. For example, the Court has held that when the police rummage through a person’s garbage left curbside, this conduct does not amount to a search. The Court reasoned that a person does not expect privacy in his garbage in relation to animals, scavengers, or children, and therefore has no privacy in his garbage with respect to anyone, including the police.

This Article argues that in assessing the Fourth Amendment, the Court should take into account the relational nature of privacy, and acknowledge that we have a greater expectation of privacy as against the government than we do as against our neighbors and friends. In fact, we desire and expect the highest level of privacy when the government pursues a criminal investigation, and it is here the Fourth Amendment should play its greatest role. This follows based upon the relational nature of privacy, certain lines of Supreme Court precedent, such as the inventory and administrative search cases, and the history of the Fourth Amendment, rooted especially in the seminal John Wilkes cases, which were initiated as a criminal case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, search and seizure John Wilkes, privacy, criminal procedure, special needs

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Sacharoff, Laurent, The Relational Nature of Privacy (2012). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 1249, 2012; University of Arkansas Research Paper No. 13-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2201903

Contact Information

Laurent Sacharoff (Contact Author)
University of Arkansas School of Law ( email )
260 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 321
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 210,602
Footnotes:  324

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds