Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2202303
 
 

Footnotes (63)



 


 



What Would Predatory Pricing Law Be Without John McGee? A Reply to Professor Leslie


Joshua D. Wright


Federal Trade Commission; George Mason University School of Law

2012

Southern California Law Review Postscript, Vol. 85, No. 5, July 2012, pp. 60-72
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-04

Abstract:     
In his 2012 article, “Revisiting the Revisionist History of Standard Oil”, Christopher Leslie takes issue with John McGee’s work on predatory pricing and its influence on antitrust law and scholarship. Leslie claims McGee’s analysis was methodologically flawed, ideologically motivated, but ultimately successful in “distorting” predatory pricing law by persuading courts to adopt a standard too permissive of anticompetitive predation. Holding aside the specific methodological critique of McGee’s analysis, in this paper I demonstrate that Leslie’s claim that McGee distorted predation law fails for a number of reasons. The most fundamental reason is that Leslie does not consider the likely counterfactual antitrust world without McGee’s analysis. Specifically, Leslie does not consider the very likely alternative explanation for the decline in plaintiffs’ success in predation cases - namely, Phillip Areeda and Donald Turner’s seminal 1975 analysis. Whether debates continue within the economics literature regarding the details of McGee’s contribution to our understanding of predatory pricing theory and the Standard Oil saga, there is scant evidence supporting Leslie’s primary claim that McGee has had a distorting influence that has induced courts to adopt permissive attitudes toward anticompetitive predation. Nor is there evidence in the economics literature supporting Leslie’s ancillary claim that current law underdeters anticompetitive predation. A proper understanding of the intellectual foundations of modern predation doctrine reveals a doctrine far more stable and durable than Leslie implies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Advo, Brooke Group Ltd., Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Chicago School, Christopher, discounts, Donald, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Frank Easterbrook, Harvard, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., monopolization, Phillip, Richard Posner, Section 2, Sherman Act, William Kovacic

JEL Classification: D40, D41, D42, D43, K21, K23, L11, L12, L14, L40, L41, L42, L43, L51

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 19, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Wright, Joshua D., What Would Predatory Pricing Law Be Without John McGee? A Reply to Professor Leslie (2012). Southern California Law Review Postscript, Vol. 85, No. 5, July 2012, pp. 60-72; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2202303

Contact Information

Joshua D. Wright (Contact Author)
Federal Trade Commission ( email )
601 New Jersey Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 337
Downloads: 33
Footnotes:  63

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.578 seconds