Footnotes (9)



Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and Policy

Maxwell Mehlman

Case Western Reserve University

Patrick Lin

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Keith Abney

California Polytechnic State University

January 18, 2013

Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-2

The United States military is making substantial investments to develop technologies that would enhance the ability of warfighters to complete their missions safely and effectively. Driven by neuroscience, biotechnology, nanotechnology, robotics, and other emerging technologies, this research includes combating sleep deprivation, improving cognitive performance, increasing strength, reducing muscle fatigue, and other enhancements to the human body and mind.

As with other emerging military technologies, such as robotics and cyber-capabilities, human enhancement technologies challenge existing laws and policy, as well as underlying ethical values. But while the implications of human enhancement generally have been widely discussed, little analysis currently exists for the military context — specifically operational, ethical, and legal implications of enhancing warfighters, such as: How safe should these human enhancements and new medical treatments be prior to their deployment (considering recent controversies such as mandatory anthrax vaccinations)? Must enhancements be reversible or temporary (considering that most warfighters will return to society as civilians)? Could enhancements count as “biological weapons” under the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (considering that the term is not clearly defined)?

This report begins an investigation into these and other issues in order to identify problems that policymakers and society may need to confront. We start with an analysis of international and domestic law, military policy, bioethics, and risk assessments. Then we offer a new framework for evaluating human enhancement technologies in a military context. As an initial model, we also discuss further considerations — related to character and honor, as well as broader social impacts — that can be integrated later into this evaluative framework.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 115

Keywords: enhanced warfighters, soldiers, military, human enhancement, bioethics, biotechnology, international humanitarian law, legitimate military purpose, necessity, consent, dignity, transparency, neurosceince, biotechnology, robotics, biological weapons, ethics, risk assessment, military policy

JEL Classification: K39

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: January 19, 2013 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Mehlman, Maxwell and Lin, Patrick and Abney, Keith, Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and Policy (January 18, 2013). Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2202982 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2202982

Contact Information

Maxwell Mehlman (Contact Author)
Case Western Reserve University ( email )
10900 Euclid Ave.
Cleveland, OH 44106
United States
Patrick Lin
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ( email )
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
United States
HOME PAGE: http://ethics.calpoly.edu
Keith Abney
California Polytechnic State University ( email )
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 703
Downloads: 163
Download Rank: 105,211
Footnotes:  9
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds