Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2203248
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



How Congress Should Fix Personal Jurisdiction


Stephen E. Sachs


Duke University School of Law

2013

Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Personal jurisdiction is a mess, and only Congress can fix it. The field is a morass, filled with buzzwords of nebulous origin and application. Courts have sought a single doctrine that simultaneously guarantees convenience for plaintiffs, fairness for defendants, and legitimate authority for the tribunal. Caught between these goals, we've let each new fact pattern pull precedent in a different direction, robbing litigants of certainty and blunting the force of our substantive law.

Solving the problem starts with reframing it. Rather than ask where a case may be heard, we should ask who may hear it. If the parties are from the same state, that state's courts are open. If not, the federal courts are. But while most hard jurisdictional problems involve states, the federal courts still follow state jurisdictional rules. This is a mistake, and also something we can change.

Following the McIntyre plurality's invitation, this Article suggests a system of nationwide federal personal jurisdiction, erasing the state lines that separate federal courts. In a federal forum, the court’s authority is usually clear and its location largely irrelevant -- letting us address the parties' convenience through well-crafted venue rules, backstopped by due process guarantees of fundamental fairness.

The Article goes on to develop draft legislative language addressing the new system's consequences for venue, choice of law, appeal rights, and so on. The goal isn't to defend one specific proposal, but to encourage new proposals and, eventually, to change the direction of the debate. Scholars should spend more time thinking about the jurisdictional rules we would write for ourselves -- which the Constitution actually lets us do, at least for federal courts. Only Congress can fix personal jurisdiction; we should start telling it how.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: personal jurisdiction

JEL Classification: K4, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 20, 2013 ; Last revised: September 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Stephen E., How Congress Should Fix Personal Jurisdiction (2013). Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2203248 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203248

Contact Information

Stephen E. Sachs (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-8542 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,525
Downloads: 258
Download Rank: 64,706
Footnotes:  108

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds