Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2203713
 
 

Footnotes (12)



 


 



Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime


Glenn Harlan Reynolds


University of Tennessee College of Law

January 20, 2013

University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 206

Abstract:     
Though extensive due process protections apply to the investigation of crimes, and to criminal trials, perhaps the most important part of the criminal process -- the decision whether to charge a defendant, and with what -- is almost entirely discretionary. Given the plethora of criminal laws and regulations in today's society, this due process gap allows prosecutors to charge almost anyone they take a deep interest in. This Essay discusses the problem in the context of recent prosecutorial controversies involving the cases of Aaron Swartz and David Gregory, and offers some suggested remedies, along with a call for further discussion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: due process, criminal law, grand jury, plea bargain, overcriminalization, Robert Jackson, Tim Wu, Harvey Silverglate, Gene Healy

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 20, 2013 ; Last revised: April 11, 2013

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, Glenn Harlan, Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime (January 20, 2013). University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 206. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2203713 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203713

Contact Information

Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996-1810
United States
865-974-6744 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 78,766
Downloads: 19,525
Download Rank: 59
Footnotes:  12

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds