Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2205093
 


 



The Transformative Power of X-Rays in U.S. Scientific & Medical Litigation: Mechanical Objectivity in Smith v. Grant (1896)


Daniel Goldberg


East Carolina University - School of Medicine

January 22, 2013

Perspectives on Science 21, No. 1 (2013): 23-57

Abstract:     
The paper locates the struggle to mobilize and regulate the immense social and cultural power inherent in X-rays’ capacity to remotely anatomize the living body power within the discursive space of the turn-of-the-century American courtroom. The paper pioneers use of extant court records in the seminal case of Smith v. Grant, the first American medical malpractice case in which an injured plaintiff successfully introduced X-ray evidence against a physician. The paper demonstrates how X-ray images catalyzed crucial changes in the American law of scientific and medical evidence and facilitated a novel regime for their regulation that continues to reverberate in the present.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: January 23, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, Daniel, The Transformative Power of X-Rays in U.S. Scientific & Medical Litigation: Mechanical Objectivity in Smith v. Grant (1896) (January 22, 2013). Perspectives on Science 21, No. 1 (2013): 23-57. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2205093

Contact Information

Daniel Goldberg (Contact Author)
East Carolina University - School of Medicine ( email )
600 Moye Boulevard
Greenville, NC 27858
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 112

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.157 seconds