Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2205175
 


 



A Traditional and Textualist Analysis of the Goals of Antitrust: Efficiency, Preventing Theft from Consumers, and Consumer Choice


Robert H. Lande


University of Baltimore - School of Law

March 20, 2013

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 81, p. 2349, 2013
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-10

Abstract:     
This article determines the overall purpose of the Antitrust statutes in two very different ways. First, it performs a traditional analysis of the legislative history of the Antitrust laws by analyzing relevant legislative debates and committee reports. Second, it undertakes a textualist or "plain meaning" determination of the purpose of the Antitrust statutes, using Justice Scalia's methodology. It does this by analyzing the meaning of key terms as they were used in contemporary dictionaries, legal treatises, common law cases, and the earliest U.S. Antitrust cases, and it does this in light of the history of the times.

Both approaches demonstrate that the overriding purpose of the Antitrust statutes is to prevent firms from stealing from consumers by charging them supracompetitive prices. When firms use their market power to raise prices to supracompetitive levels, consumers pay more for their goods and services, and these overcharges constitute a taking of consumers' property. Economic efficiency was only a secondary concern. In addition, the textualist approach leads to the surprising conclusion that neither the Sherman Act nor the Clayton Act contain an exception for monopolies attained through efficient business conduct. The Antitrust laws are supposed to prevent and condemn all privately created monopolies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: Antitrust, goals of Antitrust, legislative history, textualist, Scalia, wealth transfers, theft, no-fault monopoly, legislative intent, efficiency interpretation, monopoly, Chicago School, consumers, competition, consumer welfare, price, purposivist

JEL Classification: K19, K21, K39, K49, L40, L44, L49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 22, 2013 ; Last revised: October 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lande, Robert H., A Traditional and Textualist Analysis of the Goals of Antitrust: Efficiency, Preventing Theft from Consumers, and Consumer Choice (March 20, 2013). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 81, p. 2349, 2013; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2205175 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205175

Contact Information

Robert H. Lande (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,177
Downloads: 198
Download Rank: 88,561

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds