The Promise and Pitfalls of Women Challenging Muslim Family Laws in India and Israel (Chapter 4)
City University of New York - John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Sexuality in Muslim Contexts: Restrictions and Resistance, Anissa Helie & Homa Hoodfar (Eds.), London: Zed Books (2012), pp.98-123
Across nations one of the most common ways that women’s sexuality and personal autonomy is controlled is through family law, particularly marriage, and divorce. In essence, many such laws are in place to govern autonomous and individual expressions of sexuality, most often through the use of moral arguments located within ethno-religious traditions. Yet matters of family law are often analyzed in terms of state- or nation-building and religious practices. Indeed as Carol Pateman (1988) has shown, family law remains one of the least democratic legal and social institutions, despite women’s struggles, with limited success, for family law reform. Resistance to democratizing family law is often most pronounced by elements within ethno-religious communities which hold a minority position vis-à-vis the state, and are thus excluded from the state political power structure. This has meant that women within such communities have to develop nuanced strategies to extend their sexual and personal autonomy without alienating their community. A comparison of the cases of India and Israel -- where the Muslim minorities’ relationships with the state are extremely politicized -- provides insight into the ways in which women are contesting the governance and control of their sexuality through the re-shaping of marriage and divorce laws.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: Muslim Women's Rights, family law, Israel, India, personal status lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 22, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds