Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208163
 
 

Footnotes (86)



 


 



Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a 'Diligent Search' under Present and Proposed Regimes?


David R. Hansen


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Gwen Hinze


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Jennifer M. Urban


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

January 28, 2013

Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project, White Paper No. 4

Abstract:     
Over the past several years, policy makers and private actors have developed an evolving set of approaches for addressing the orphan works problem — a problem that arises when “the owner of a copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires permission of the copyright owner,” preventing follow-on uses of works. These approaches usually attempt to address the orphan works problem by employing some threshold mechanism to differentiate true orphan works, to which the proposed solutions would apply, from non-orphaned copyrighted works. Satisfying a “reasonably diligent search” is one well-known formulation by which users can designate works as orphaned and therefore subject to a proposed solution, though — as this paper points out — alternative approaches certainly exist. Regardless of the specific formulation, the search for rightsholders (or conversely, the confirmation that no rightsholder can be located) is an integral component of almost every orphan works proposal. This paper examines in detail the core schemes for identifying rightsholders among the leading orphan works regimes and proposals. Although these schemes differ across many variables, three factors predominate: (1) who is expected to participate in the search process, (2) the nature and extent of the required search generally; and (3) specifically what types of resources, tools, registries or other information-sharing mechanisms are required or allowed.

This paper compares existing proposals’ approaches with respect to the first factor: who participates in a search? A subsequent paper will focus on the second and third factors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: orphan works, extended collective licensing, ECL, mass digitization, diligent search

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 31, 2013 ; Last revised: February 14, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hansen, David R. and Hinze, Gwen and Urban, Jennifer M., Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a 'Diligent Search' under Present and Proposed Regimes? (January 28, 2013). Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project, White Paper No. 4. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208163

Contact Information

David R. Hansen (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
G. A. Hinze
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Jennifer M. Urban
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
(510) 642-7338 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.samuelsonclinic.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,343
Downloads: 564
Download Rank: 26,316
Footnotes:  86

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.562 seconds