Halting the Profession's Female Brain Drain While Increasing the Provision of Legal Services to the Poor: A Proposal to Revamp and Expand Emeritus Attorney Programs
Claudine V. Pease-Wingenter
Arizona Summit Law School
Oklahoma City University Law Review, Vol. 37, 2012
The article begins by describing the current female brain drain in the legal profession. Despite years of gender parity in law school, women currently comprise only about a third of practitioners. A number of factors lead to this situation, but a significant cause is the frequent “perfect storm” of simultaneously establishing oneself in a demanding new profession while also meeting significant caregiving responsibilities at home. Women often take time-off from paid employment for family reasons, but find it difficult to return to the legal profession after the isolation of such a hiatus.
The article advocates reforms to the licensure rules to empower lawyers on such a hiatus to do pro bono work. The provision of such pro bono services could make a huge dent in the devastating “justice gap” that currently plagues our society and undermines our legal system. Moreover, such reforms could also alleviate the trend of women who drift away from the legal profession permanently.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: Feminist legal theory, Women in the profession, Pro bono, Indigent clients, Gender, Female, Sexism, Feminism, Gender bias, Mommy track, Brain drain, Family leave, Maternity leave, Dual career families, Emeritus, Care giving, Parenthood, Justice gap, Low income, Poor, Legal professionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 28, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds