Florida State University - College of Law
January 30, 2013
41 Hofstra Law Review 53 (2012)
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 624
In legal argumentation, appeals to certainty and predictability have enormous rhetorical power. This Article argues that their use outstrips their legitimate role in legal analysis. The Article is not literally “against certainty” in the sense that it promotes uncertainty as a good thing in itself; it is just a skeptical consideration of the role of appeals to certainty in legal theory. The Article’s principal contention is that arguments about certainty are often mistaken, that certainty itself is often misunderstood, and that many defenses of certainty in legal rules are tautological, irrelevant, or substantively overstated.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: certainty, formalism, predictability, precedent, reliance, uncertainty, legal theory, common law
JEL Classification: K10, K12, K13, K19, K00, K40
Date posted: February 1, 2013 ; Last revised: May 6, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds