Against Certainty

Shawn J. Bayern

Florida State University - College of Law

January 30, 2013

Hofstra Law Review, Forthcoming
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 624

In legal argumentation, appeals to certainty and predictability have enormous rhetorical power. This Article argues that their use outstrips their legitimate role in legal analysis. The Article is not literally “against certainty” in the sense that it promotes uncertainty as a good thing in itself; it is just a skeptical consideration of the role of appeals to certainty in legal theory. The Article’s principal contention is that arguments about certainty are often mistaken, that certainty itself is often misunderstood, and that many defenses of certainty in legal rules are tautological, irrelevant, or substantively overstated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: certainty, formalism, predictability, precedent, reliance, uncertainty, legal theory, common law

JEL Classification: K10, K12, K13, K19, K00, K40

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2013 ; Last revised: February 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bayern, Shawn J., Against Certainty (January 30, 2013). Hofstra Law Review, Forthcoming; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 624. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209363

Contact Information

Shawn J. Bayern (Contact Author)
Florida State University - College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 401
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 107,444

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds