Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209363
 


 



Against Certainty


Shawn J. Bayern


Florida State University - College of Law

January 30, 2013

41 Hofstra Law Review 53 (2012)
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 624

Abstract:     
In legal argumentation, appeals to certainty and predictability have enormous rhetorical power. This Article argues that their use outstrips their legitimate role in legal analysis. The Article is not literally “against certainty” in the sense that it promotes uncertainty as a good thing in itself; it is just a skeptical consideration of the role of appeals to certainty in legal theory. The Article’s principal contention is that arguments about certainty are often mistaken, that certainty itself is often misunderstood, and that many defenses of certainty in legal rules are tautological, irrelevant, or substantively overstated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: certainty, formalism, predictability, precedent, reliance, uncertainty, legal theory, common law

JEL Classification: K10, K12, K13, K19, K00, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2013 ; Last revised: May 6, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bayern, Shawn J., Against Certainty (January 30, 2013). 41 Hofstra Law Review 53 (2012); FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 624. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209363

Contact Information

Shawn J. Bayern (Contact Author)
Florida State University - College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 470
Downloads: 184
Download Rank: 95,622

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.657 seconds