Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209670
 
 

Footnotes (154)



 


 



On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison


Ming-Sung Kuo


University of Warwick School of Law

2013

Global Constitutionalism (Forthcoming)
Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/01

Abstract:     
The question of constitutionalization cuts through the heart of theoretical debate on the fragmentation of global governance. This paper aims to contribute to this debate through a comparison of global administrative law (GAL) and the conflicts-law approach. While the conflicts-law approach espouses the move towards global constitutionalism, GAL disavows constitutional ambition. I make a twofold argument. First, the differing diagnoses these two approaches make of global governance lead to their distinct proposed solutions. GAL identifies the lack of accountability as the underlying concern of global governance and responds to fragmented global governance through balancing-centered legal management. The conflicts-law approach instead attributes the challenges facing global governance to the ill-designed democratic institutions in nation-states and turns to ‘democratic juridification’ as the solution. Second, GAL and the conflicts-law approach reflect two distinct images of constitutionalism. GAL’s ‘constitutional deficit’ suggests its implicit embrace of a version of constitutionalism rooted in the tradition of populist democracy. The conflicts-law approach situates transnational democracy in the conflicts-law process in which inter-regime conflicts are resolved, suggesting a prototype of constitutionalized global governance underpinned by an epistemic understanding of democracy. Despite distancing itself from its private international law predecessors, the conflicts-law approach’s epistemic view of democratic constitutionalism echoes the central role of the community of academic lawyers that Friedrich Carl von Savigny espoused in the nineteenth-century liberal reform in international law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: global constitutionalism, global governance, the conflicts-law approach, global administrative law, populist and epistemic constitutionalism, academic lawyers, Friedrich Carl von Savigny

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2013 ; Last revised: February 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Kuo, Ming-Sung, On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison (2013). Global Constitutionalism (Forthcoming); Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209670

Contact Information

Ming-Sung Kuo (Contact Author)
University of Warwick School of Law ( email )
Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/kuo/

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 372
Downloads: 88
Download Rank: 171,792
Footnotes:  154
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Law, Rights and Development
By John Linarelli

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.343 seconds