Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2210049
 
 

Footnotes (215)



 


 



The Federal Circuit's New Obviousness Jurisprudence: An Empirical Study


Jason Rantanen


University of Iowa - College of Law

February 1, 2012

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2013
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-9

Abstract:     
Following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. Teleflex, commentators predicted that one of two things would happen: the Federal Circuit would change how it actually ruled on the issue of whether patents were obvious or that it would merely change what it said.

This study empirically examines these two predictions using a novel dataset comprised of all pre- and post-KSR Federal Circuit decisions on obviousness over a fifteen-year period. Examining this data reveals strong evidence that KSR has indeed altered the outcomes of the Federal Circuit’s obviousness determinations, a change that has manifested in large part through an increase in the deference that the Federal Circuit is giving to district court determinations that patents are obvious.

Moving beyond an examination of outcomes alone, this study uses the technique of content analysis to explore the heart of the second prediction: that KSR would affect what the Federal Circuit says about obviousness. This analysis demonstrates that the Federal Circuit has indeed changed what it says. Essentially gone is the use of the Federal Circuit’s ubiquitous pre-KSR “teaching, suggestion, or motivation” (“TSM”) framework in analyzing obviousness. Furthermore, while the underlying requirement that patent challengers identify some “reason to combine” or “reason to modify” prior art references has endured, it is hardly a reincarnation of TSM, either in terms of vigor or structure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: patent, obviousness, empirical

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2013 ; Last revised: December 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Rantanen, Jason, The Federal Circuit's New Obviousness Jurisprudence: An Empirical Study (February 1, 2012). Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2013; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2210049 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2210049

Contact Information

Jason Rantanen (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,372
Downloads: 1,021
Download Rank: 11,009
Footnotes:  215

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds