Abstract

 


 



Cancellation Latency: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


Pawan Jain


University of Memphis

Steven J. Jordan


Econometric Solutions

February 5, 2013


Abstract:     
HFT involves submitting large numbers of orders to generate congestion. Regulators classify such stuffing activity as a type of market manipulation. Thus, regulators are considering cut-off value for minimal quote life. However, even simple summary statistics for the time an order takes to go from being placed to being posted or how long a cancellation order takes to execute on the exchange are not available. Without such empirically facts it is difficult to understand the potential impact of HFT or how to regulate it. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature and provide several statistics concerning cancellation latency.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: cancellation, latency, high frequency trading, HFT, quote stuffing, market regulation, volume, risk, latency arbitrage, microstructure

JEL Classification: F00, G00, G14, G15, G18, G19, K2, K33, L11, L51, L98, N25

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Jain, Pawan and Jordan, Steven J., Cancellation Latency: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (February 5, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2212504 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2212504

Contact Information

Pawan Jain
University of Memphis ( email )
Memphis, TN 38152-3370
United States
Steven J. Jordan (Contact Author)
Econometric Solutions ( email )
3520 Fossil Park Dr.
Fort Worth, TX NA 76137
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 356
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 129,698

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds