The Problem of, and with, Financial Crime
University of Melbourne - Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation
July 19, 2012
Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol 63, No 4, pp.495-508, Winter 2012
Financial crime is a term that is widely used, but it is a label or category that is bedevilled by definitional uncertainty and this uncertainty impacts upon how it is perceived and acted upon by law enforcement and other regulatory actors. This is perhaps not surprising and echoes many of the difficulties that have plagued efforts to counter white-collar crime. This article considers the definitional and other ambiguities that have permeated debates about both white-collar and financial crime. The analysis draws on a short survey which asked law enforcement and other regulatory actors in Australia and the UK whose responsibilities included countering behaviors that could be viewed as financial crime, what operational definitions of financial crime they employed in the course of their work. Results indicate that definitional uncertainty ensures that there are numerous understandings of what constitutes financial crime and no immediate prospect of a universal legal definition. However, there are some interesting classification developments for financial crime emerging from the business sciences literature and inter-disciplinary approaches would seem to offer the most promise for categorizing the suite of evolving behaviors that comprise financial crime.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: financial crime, white-collar crime, classification
JEL Classification: G18, G30, K42
Date posted: February 6, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds