Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2213593
 
 

Footnotes (54)



 


 



Whose Line is it Anyway? Originalist Historical Methodology and the Problem of Inadequate Interdisciplinary Practice


Adam Mourad


Independent

February 7, 2013


Abstract:     
This article seeks to outline sound historical practice in the legal context and to provide a critique of originalist historical methodology.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Heller, Second Amendment, History, historiography, Scalia, Originalism, Originalist, Constitution, Constitutional Law, Interpretation

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Mourad, Adam, Whose Line is it Anyway? Originalist Historical Methodology and the Problem of Inadequate Interdisciplinary Practice (February 7, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2213593 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2213593

Contact Information

Adam Mourad (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 319
Downloads: 79
Download Rank: 181,101
Footnotes:  54

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.547 seconds