|
||||
|
||||
Keeping Up with the Joneses: Making Sure Your History Is Just as Wrong as Everyone Else'sBrian SawersUniversity of Maryland - Francis King Carey School of Law February 7, 2013 Michigan Law Review First Impressions, Vol. 111, p. 21, February 2013 Abstract: Both the majority and concurring opinions in United States v. Jones are wrong about the state of the law in 1791. Landowners in America had no right to exclude others from unfenced land. Whether a Fourth Amendment search requires a trespass or the violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy, government can explore open land without a search warrant. In the United States, landowners did not have a right of action against people who entered open land without permission. No eighteenth-century case shows a remedy for mere entry. Vermont and Pennsylvania constitutionally guaranteed a right to hunt on open land. In several other states, statutes regulating hunting implied a public right to hunt on (and, by implication, enter) unfenced land.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6 Keywords: Fourth Amendment, open fields doctrine, trespass JEL Classification: K11 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 9, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds