The Dirty Laundry of Employee Award Programs: Evidence from the Field
Washington University in Saint Louis - John M. Olin Business School
Harvard Business School - Negotiation, Organizations and Markets Unit
Washington University, Saint Louis - John M. Olin School of Business
February 11, 2013
Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 13-069
Many scholars and practitioners have recently argued that corporate awards are a "free" way to motivate employees. We use field data from an attendance award program implemented at one of five industrial laundry plants to show that awards can carry significant spillover costs and may be less effective at motivating employees than the literature suggests. Our quasi-experimental setting shows that two types of unintended consequences limit gains from the reward program. First, employees strategically game the program, improving timeliness only when eligible for the award, and call in sick to retain eligibility. Second, employees with perfect pre-program attendance or high productivity suffered a 6-8% productivity decrease after program introduction, suggesting they were demotivated by awards for good behavior they already exhibited. Overall, our results suggest the award program decreased plant productivity by 1.4%, and that positive effects from awards are accompanied by more complex employee responses that limit program effectiveness.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36working papers series
Date posted: February 12, 2013 ; Last revised: February 21, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.922 seconds