City of Arlington v. FCC: Questioning Agency Authority to Determine the Scope of Its Own Authority
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
February 16, 2013
Perspectives from FSF Scholars, Vol. 7, No. 33, November 2012
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-7
In City of Arlington v. FCC the Supreme Court will consider whether courts should defer to an agency’s determination of its own jurisdiction. Although the need for courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions under Chevron v. NRDC is well-established, the Supreme Court has never decided whether so-called Chevron deference should apply to statutory provisions delineating the scope of agency jurisdiction. There are several reasons courts should not confer Chevron deference to agency interpretations of statutes that define or limit an agency’s jurisdiction. First, the conferral of Chevron deference is premised upon the existence of agency jurisdiction. If there is no jurisdiction, there is no deference. So before a court can even consider whether an agency should receive deference for its statutory interpretation, it must first assure itself that agency jurisdiction exists. Granting Chevron deference to agency interpretations of their own jurisdiction also creates the risk of agency self-aggrandizement.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: City of Arlington v. FCC, agency jurisdiction, administrative law, Chevron v. NRDC, Chevron doctrine, Chevron deference
JEL Classification: K23
Date posted: February 17, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds