The Jury as a Political Institution: An Internal Perspective
Robert P. Burns
Northwestern University - School of Law
February 15, 2013
William & Mary Law Review, Forthcoming
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 13-02
Political institutions or practices are usually defined in contrast to legal or moral institutions or practices. All three terms have shifting meanings. I consider the ways in which the American jury trial can be considered a political institution in light of these possible contrasts. I describe the way in which Hannah Arendt, probably the most important political philosopher of the twentieth century (and a lover of such distinctions), changed her view of the contrast between the legal and the political, initially formed by consideration of law in the Third Reich, after her own experience as an American juror. I then review the ways in which the linguistic practices in which we actually engage at trial can be understood as political. Finally, I discuss two recent attempts to revitalize the American criminal jury as a political institution, those of the late William Stuntz and political scientist Albert Dzur.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: Jury, Trial, Political, Legal, Arendt
JEL Classification: K1, K4, K10, K14, K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 18, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.703 seconds