University of Michigan Law School
March 4, 2013
University of Chicago Law Review, 2013
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 312
Constitutional theory features a persistent controversy over the source or sources of constitutional status; that is, over the criteria that qualify some rules as constitutional rules. This Article contends that no single criterion characterizes all of the rules that American law treats as constitutional, such that it is a mistake to think of constitutionality as a status with necessary conditions. It is better to think of constitutionality on a bundle-of-sticks model: different attributes associated with constitutionality might or might not be present in any constitutional rule. As a result, decision makers should often direct their attention more to the separate substantive properties that are associated with constitutionality than to the question of constitutional status itself.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 67
Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Theory, Constitutional Interpretation
JEL Classification: K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 21, 2013 ; Last revised: May 13, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds