Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2221695
 


 



The Sraffa-Hayek Debate on the Natural Rate of Interest


David Glasner


Federal Trade Commission

Paul R. Zimmerman


U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics

February 20, 2013


Abstract:     
F. A. Hayek's Prices and Production based on his hugely successful lectures at LSE in1931 were the first English presentation of Austrian business-cycle theory and established Hayek as a leading business-cycle theorist. Sraffa's highly critical 1932 review of Prices and Production seems to have been instrumental in turning opinion against Hayek and the Austrian theory. A key element of Sraffa's attack was that the idea of a natural rate of interest, reflecting the underlying real non-monetary relationships, undisturbed by monetary factors, was, from Hayek's perspective, incoherent, because, without money, there is a multiplicity of own rates, none of which can be identified as the natural rate of interest. The natural rate could have meaning only if it were defined as an average of the own rates, but, having rejected the use of index numbers, Hayek had foreclosed that option. Hayek's response failed to counter Sraffa’s argument. However, as Ludwig Lachmann later pointed out, Keynes's treatment of own rates in Chapter 17 of the General Theory undercuts Sraffa's criticism. Own rates, in any intertemporal equilibrium, cannot deviate from each other by more than expected price appreciation or depreciation plus the cost of storage and the service flow provided by the commodity, so that the net anticipated yield from holding assets are all are equal in intertemporal equilibrium. Thus, the natural rate of interest, on Keynes's analysis in the General Theory, is well-defined, at least up to a scalar multiple reflecting the choice of numeraire. However, Keynes’s revision of Sraffa’s own-rate analysis provides only a partial rehabilitation of Hayek's natural rate. Since there is no unique price level in a barter system, a unique money natural rate of interest cannot be specified. Hayek implicitly was reasoning in terms of a constant nominal value of GDP, but barter relationships cannot identify any path for nominal GDP, let alone a constant one, as uniquely compatible with intertemporal equilibrium.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: barter economy, business cycles, Fisher, Hayek, intertemporal equilibrium, Keynes, money, natural rate, own rate, Sraffa

JEL Classification: B22, B30, E30, E31, E32, E43, E52

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Glasner, David and Zimmerman, Paul R., The Sraffa-Hayek Debate on the Natural Rate of Interest (February 20, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2221695 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2221695

Contact Information

David Glasner (Contact Author)
Federal Trade Commission ( email )
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
202-326-3345 (Phone)
Paul R. Zimmerman
U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics ( email )
601 New Jersey Ave. NW
Rm. 8103
Washington, DC 20580
United States
HOME PAGE: http://paul.r.zimmerman.googlepages.com/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,047
Downloads: 255
Download Rank: 65,526

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds