Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222390
 
 

Footnotes (160)



 


 



State v. Reed: Twenty Years of the Common-Law Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Retrospect


Casey G. Watkins


affiliation not provided to SSRN

February 21, 2013


Abstract:     
In an era of codification and statutory law, several states still rely on the common law to protect vital individual rights. As an example, New Jersey grounds its protection against self-incrimination in the common law, not its state constitution.

In this Article, I compare two remarkably similar cases involving police deception during custodial interrogations — one before the Supreme Court of the United States and the other before the Supreme Court of New Jersey. The issue faced by each court was the admissibility of confessions obtained after police officers failed to inform a suspect that an attorney had been retained on his behalf, was present, and was seeking to advise him. The article explains the federal precedent by examining Moran v. Burbine, a 1986 Supreme Court decision. By comparing Moran with State v. Reed, a New Jersey Supreme Court decision nearing its twentieth anniversary — I explore (1) the methods used by state courts when departing from federal precedent, and (2) the efficacy of using the common law to do so.

I posit that not only, was the court’s decision to base Reed on the common-law right against self-incrimination rather than resorting to constitutional adjudication legitimate, but that it was the better course of action. Indeed, I believe that New Jersey can serve as a model for other states in this regard. Not only does the court’s methodology conform to long-standing rules of judicial construction, it also affords a level of flexibility and reasonableness not available from broad constitutional pronouncements.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Common Law, Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, State v. Reed, Moran v. Burbine, New Jersey Supreme Court

JEL Classification: K14, K10, K19, K40

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2013 ; Last revised: February 28, 2013

Suggested Citation

Watkins, Casey G., State v. Reed: Twenty Years of the Common-Law Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Retrospect (February 21, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222390 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222390

Contact Information

Casey G. Watkins (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 178
Downloads: 22
Footnotes:  160

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds