Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222588
 


 



Unworthiness to Inherit, Public Policy, Forfeiture: The Scottish Story


John MacLeod


University of Glasgow

Reinhard Zimmermann


Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law

April 1, 2013

Tulane Law Review (Tul. L. Rev.), Vol. 87, No. 4., pp. 741-785, 2013
Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 13/9

Abstract:     
The concerns addressed by the civilian rules on unworthiness to inherit (indignitas succedendi) must be addressed by any legal system. When they arose in Scotland, responses tended to be found by the extension or development of other rules. Even where there was reference to the idea of unworthiness, as in the Parricide Act 1594 and in Buchanan v Paterson (1704), the result was later reconceptualized along different lines. In recent years, the Scottish courts have been more receptive to the public policy principle that no-one is to benefit from his own wrong, taken from the English common law. Even there, however, the Scottish courts have shown a reluctance to follow foreign authorities too closely. The result is a series of shoots, each taking a slightly different direction and none of them growing to maturity. Thus, whatever might be said about Lord Cooper's characterization of Scottish legal history as a story of "false starts and rejected experiments" on a general level, it is certainly an accurate description of the story told in this paper, i.e. of the treatment of persons who do not deserve to inherit in Scots Law.

It is remarkable how much of the discussion in Scots Law is focused on cases involving the killing of the deceased. The differences between the unworthiness and the public policy approach do not in fact play a role in this situation, and that is probably the reason why they have not elicited much comment. Beyond killing there is hardly any case law. One of the main reasons for this appears to be that other legal devices are available to take care of many, perhaps most, of the practical problems that may be raised in other instances of unworthiness to inherit.

Acknowledgement: This is the publisher's version of the article of John MacLeod and Reinhard Zimmermann, Unworthiness to Inherit, Public Policy, Forfeiture: The Scottish Story, Vol. 87, No. 4, Tulane Law Review, pp. 741-785, 2013.

This article is published in this Research Paper Series with the permission of the Tulane Law Review in accordance with its Author/Journal Publication Agreement and Copyright License. For further information on the Journal, please visit its website.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: facility and circumvention, forfeiture, indignitas succedendi, law of succession, lesion, nemo ex suo delicto meliorem suam condicionem facere potest, parricide, public policy, undue inluence, unworthiness to inherit

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2013 ; Last revised: April 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

MacLeod, John and Zimmermann, Reinhard, Unworthiness to Inherit, Public Policy, Forfeiture: The Scottish Story (April 1, 2013). Tulane Law Review (Tul. L. Rev.), Vol. 87, No. 4., pp. 741-785, 2013; Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 13/9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222588

Contact Information

John MacLeod
University of Glasgow ( email )
Stair Building
5 - 8 The Square
Glasgow, Scotland G12 8QQ
United Kingdom
Reinhard Zimmermann (Contact Author)
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law ( email )
Mittelweg 187
Hamburg, 20148
Germany
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 461
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 200,339

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.516 seconds