References (13)



Legal Theory Lexicon 071: The New Originalism

Lawrence B. Solum

Georgetown University Law Center

February 24, 2013

The entry in the Legal Theory Lexicon series describes the New Originalism. Originalism can be viewed as a family of theories organized around two core ideas: (1) The Fixation Thesis, the factual claim that the linguistic meaning of the constitution is fixed at the time each provision is framed and ratified, and (2) The Constraint Principle, the normative claim that the original meaning should constraint constitutional practice. To these two core ideas, the New Originalism adds two others: (1) The Public Meaning Thesis, the claim that the original meaning of the constitutional text is its public meaning, and (2) the Interpretation-Construction Distinction, the claim that constitutional practice consists of two distinct activities: (a) Interpretation is the discovery of linguistic meaning, and (b) Construction is the determination of legal effect, including both constitutional doctrine and the decision of constitutional cases. Criticisms of the New Originalism are briefly summarized.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: constitution, constitutional law, constitutional theory, interpretation, construction, originalism, new originalism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Solum, Lawrence B., Legal Theory Lexicon 071: The New Originalism (February 24, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2223663 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2223663

Contact Information

Lawrence B. Solum (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 679
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 171,033
References:  13

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.703 seconds