Carrots, Sticks, and Salience
Brian D. Galle
Georgetown University Law Center
February 25, 2013
Tax Law Review, Forthcoming
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 290
This Article considers the second-best design of Pigouvian taxes and subsidies in the presence of agents who are imperfectly aware of the instrument. Until very recently, the price instrument literature has assumed perfect rationality, and even the handful of prior attempts to account for “hidden” prices focus mainly on the income tax. I extend these efforts in several directions. First, I show that the best available instrument for correcting negative externalities is often one whose price is partially adjusted upwards -- or, in the case of subsidies, downwards -- to counter-act the neglect of irrational actors. In addition, I argue that the salience of a price instrument can affect the choice between sticks and carrots, potentially making carrots a more viable option than is usually claimed in existing literature. I also address the cases of positive externalities, “hyper-salient” actors who are excessively attentive to price instruments, and combinations of each. Finally, I highlight evidence suggesting that the problem of imperfect awareness of price instruments is likely inevitable and widespread, implying that even if government does not intentionally set out to manipulate public awareness of its policies, salience will typically be an important factor in policy design.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: pigouvian tax, salience, externality, price instrument, hidden taxes, behavioral economics, charitable contribution deduction, carbon tax
JEL Classification: D62, H23, H31
Date posted: February 27, 2013 ; Last revised: July 30, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds