Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224364
 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



Why Did Law Professors Misunderestimate the Lawsuits against PPACA?


David A. Hyman


University of Illinois College of Law

July 23, 2014

2014 University of Illinois Law Review 805
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 13-40
Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS13-19

Abstract:     
Almost without exception, law professors dismissed the possibility that the Patient Protection and Affordable Act Act ("PPACA") might be unconstitutional -- but something went wrong on the way to the courthouse. What explains the epic failure of law professors to accurately predict how Article III judges would handle the case? After considering three possible defenses/justifications, this essay identifies five factors that help explain the erroneous predictions of our nation’s elite law professors, who were badly wrong, but never in doubt.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: constitutional law, health reform, PPACA

JEL Classification: K19, K23

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2013 ; Last revised: July 24, 2014

Suggested Citation

Hyman, David A., Why Did Law Professors Misunderestimate the Lawsuits against PPACA? (July 23, 2014). 2014 University of Illinois Law Review 805; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 13-40; Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS13-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224364

Contact Information

David A. Hyman (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,901
Downloads: 1,346
Download Rank: 7,036
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds