Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2225395
 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



Should DOJ’s Controversial Approach to Market Definition Control Merger Litigation, the Case of US v. H&R Block


Joseph J. Simons


Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP

Malcolm B. Coate


U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

October 24, 2013


Abstract:     
Sometimes what appears to be a little, almost imperceptible change can have a huge impact on a policy regime. The recently revised DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines contain such a change, as the document recognizes the importance of Critical Loss Analysis in defining a market, but introduces a theoretical construct to control the analysis. This approach imposes a structure based on the economist’s Lerner index, and then applies a specific style of diversion analysis to compute the actual loss to a hypothetical price increase. We show that this methodology almost guarantees narrow markets, a change that could support a very significant increase in the level of merger enforcement. However, we also show how this aggressive policy result depends on specific assumptions that are often not justified. Change these assumptions and the traditional implications of a critical loss analysis are restored. The recent Department of Justice (DOJ) challenge of H&R Block’s proposed acquisition of the TaxACT software is used to illustrate the problem. Unjustified theoretical assumptions allowed the DOJ’s expert economist to testify to a narrow market that virtually guaranteed that the merger would be found anticompetitive. In effect, theory, if allowed to control market definition analysis, would significantly reduce the plaintiff’s burden of proof and expand the potential for merger enforcement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: market definition, critical loss, diversion, H&R Block, Merger Guidelines

JEL Classification: K21, L40

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2013 ; Last revised: October 24, 2013

Suggested Citation

Simons, Joseph J. and Coate, Malcolm B., Should DOJ’s Controversial Approach to Market Definition Control Merger Litigation, the Case of US v. H&R Block (October 24, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2225395 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2225395

Contact Information

Joseph J. Simons (Contact Author)
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP ( email )
New York, NY 10019
United States
Malcolm B. Coate
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ( email )
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 590
Downloads: 123
Download Rank: 134,344
Footnotes:  104

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds