Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226658
 
 

Footnotes (252)



 


 



Meaningful Membership: Making War a Bit More Criminal


Rachel Elizabeth VanLandingham


Stetson University College of Law

March 5, 2013


Abstract:     
Should membership in a particular group, by itself, be enough for the government to kill you? This Article starts with the classic lawyer answer of “it depends” but goes beyond it to answer yes, explain why, and recommend limits. The heart of the matter is found in how the law of armed conflict treats transnational, non-state armed groups such as al-Qaeda. When such groups are viewed analogously to state militaries, their members are lawfully subject to lethal attack based on their membership status, distinct from actual hostile conduct. By comparing this focus on status to federal criminal law’s treatment of membership, this Article exposes the current targeting paradigm’s dangerous lack of membership criteria. This legal insufficiency exposes the United States to legitimate charges of arbitrary killing.

Yet far from calling for the demise of membership-based targeting in warfare, this article defends the practice while outlining a vital need for clear legal limits. Its primary contribution is its suggestion that guidelines should be drawn from criminal law’s more developed treatment of membership and associational ties as grounds for government action. Specifically, it proposes formally incorporating 18 U.S.C. § 2339B’s conduct plus coordination model, used to prosecute material support to terrorist organizations, into the wartime membership assessment process. This Article reveals that while the wartime methodology roughly approximates the federal statute’s approach, it is legally insufficient due to its ad hoc nature, unbounded scope and lack of rigor. To fix these deficiencies in wartime identification, this Article’s normative analysis highlights both the utility of adopting the statutory model’s categorical method, and the criticality of adding a tailored scienter requirement. Without such limitations, enemy group membership is legally meaningless, and its service as grounds to kill questionable at best.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2013 ; Last revised: April 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

VanLandingham, Rachel Elizabeth, Meaningful Membership: Making War a Bit More Criminal (March 5, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226658 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2226658

Contact Information

Rachel Elizabeth VanLandingham (Contact Author)
Stetson University College of Law ( email )
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 300
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 217,991
Footnotes:  252

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.375 seconds