Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226665
 
 

Footnotes (355)



 


 



Inequality, Individualized Risk, and Insecurity


Michael J. Zimmer


Loyola University Chicago School of Law

February 20, 2013

Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 1, 2013
Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-002

Abstract:     
Based on the 24th Fairchild Lecture at the University of Wisconsin Law School, this article demonstrates how extreme economic inequality in this country exacerbates the insecurity most people face. Four areas of labor and employment law are explored to show the risks workers carry and how economic inequality heightens them. While the increasingly globalized economy, and its resulting increase in business volatility, has contributed to economic inequality, in the United States much of that inequality is the consequence of government action and inaction. Government policy has moved from the goal of decreasing inequality after World War II to increasing it in the last forty years. That this has gone unchallenged until the Great Recession is the result of a general decline in focus on inequality in society generally, but also by many academic disciplines. The collective good has lost out to an idealized view of individualism, individualism divorced from the reality of the lives most people lead.

The richest segment of society has invested, and continues to invest, considerable effort to reinforce our focus on narrow individualism and to gain influence in government policy making. While that effort has been undertaken quite broadly, the investment in election outcomes has led to a bidding war between the two parties for campaign and electioneering money. In Citizens United, the Supreme Court opened unlimited electioneering spending to individuals, corporations and other organizations. The government has lost the power to regulate the present “gift economy” in Washington that now drives the establishment of government policy: Buying access to policy makers is not, as a matter of constitutional law, corruption or its appearance and so it cannot be regulated.

Recapturing public policy from the undue influence of money will be quite difficult in face of Citizens United. Further, our politicians and policy makers, without regard to party affiliation, fear change in the status quo and so far resist reforms that are possible even within the tight constraints of Citizens United. The article will discuss the work being done in several academic disciplines to refocus on economic inequality. But a change in academic focus is only one small step in the right direction. Given the momentum supporting the present system, it may take a broad-based social movement to force changes in election spending. That is a prerequisite for government policymakers to escape the overwhelming role that money now plays in establishing national policy to allow them to once again address the real needs of our nation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Economic Inequality, Labor and Employment, Citizens United, Election Spending, Money in Politics, Campaign Finance

JEL Classification: D63, J38, J70, K31

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Zimmer, Michael J., Inequality, Individualized Risk, and Insecurity (February 20, 2013). Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 1, 2013; Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226665

Contact Information

Michael J. Zimmer (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312.915.7919 (Phone)
312.915.7201 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 701
Downloads: 119
Download Rank: 142,362
Footnotes:  355

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds