Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226672
 
 

Footnotes (195)



 


 



The Toxicity of Low-Dose Chemical Exposures: A Status Report and a Proposal, Reviewing Carl Cranor, Legally Poisoned: How the Law Puts US at Risk from Toxicants


Mary L. Lyndon


St. John's University - School of Law

July 1, 2012

52 Jurimetrics 457 (2012)
St. Johns School of Law Research Paper No. 13-0003

Abstract:     
There is no general requirement in U.S. law that manufacturers of chemicals test for the environmental and health effects of their products. As a result, firms can forego testing and then, in disputes over toxicity, argue that no harm has been proven. However, we know that environmental factors are important contributors to many diseases. Carl Cranor's LEGALLY POISONED: HOW THE LAW PUTS US AT RISK FROM TOXICANTS outlines recent scientific breakthroughs that have substantial implications for the market and for law. Some low level chemical exposures in utero and in early childhood have been linked to diseases that occur later in life; in the field of epigenetics, there are indications that some environmentally induced health effects persist into later generations, without changes in genetic material.

Cranor proposes that the act of exposing people to untested potential toxicants be considered a dignitary tort, an offensive battery. Recognition of the battery action in this context would provide an incentive for manufacturers to either perform basic toxicity testing. This is what the law already requires for pharmaceuticals and pesticides and what the European Union is now imposing on all commercial chemicals in its market. Recognizing a common law obligation to test suspect chemicals for toxicity would normalize the duties of U.S. chemical manufacturers.

This review outlines highlights of the research that Cranor describes and reports briefly on recent developments in chemicals regulation and legislative reform. It then discusses the use of the offensive battery action in this context. Offensiveness in the law of battery is judged by a community standard. Thus it is a defense to the action that the offensive contact was the kind of ordinary touching that is customary and reasonably necessary to daily life. If anyone has doubted it, sociological and cognitive research shows that exposure to untested chemicals is not acceptable to ordinary people. The common law of offensive battery provides an important alternative to the regulatory risk-management frame.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 1, 2013 ; Last revised: April 26, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lyndon, Mary L., The Toxicity of Low-Dose Chemical Exposures: A Status Report and a Proposal, Reviewing Carl Cranor, Legally Poisoned: How the Law Puts US at Risk from Toxicants (July 1, 2012). St. Johns School of Law Research Paper No. 13-0003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2226672

Contact Information

Mary L. Lyndon (Contact Author)
St. John's University - School of Law ( email )
8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 245
Downloads: 35
Footnotes:  195

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds