Abstract

 


 



The Uneasy Case for Favoring Long-Term Shareholders


Jesse M. Fried


Harvard Law School

March 18, 2013

ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 200

Abstract:     
Proposals to favor long-term shareholders of public firms are based on a widely-held belief: that long-term shareholders, unlike short-term shareholders, benefit from managers maximizing the long-term economic value generated by the firm. This belief, I show, is mistaken. Long-term shareholders, like short-term shareholders, can benefit from managers destroying economic value — even if the firm’s only residual claimants are its shareholders. My analysis suggests that the case for shifting power from short-term to long-term shareholders is substantially weaker than it might appear.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: corporate governance, short-termism, short-term shareholders, long-term shareholders, agency costs, earnings manipulation, managerial myopia, share repurchases, open market repurchases, acquisitions, seasoned equity offerings, real earnings management

JEL Classification: G32, G34, G35, G38, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2013 ; Last revised: April 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Fried, Jesse M., The Uneasy Case for Favoring Long-Term Shareholders (March 18, 2013). ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 200. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2227080 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2227080

Contact Information

Jesse M. Fried (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Griswold Hall 506
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-384-8158 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/jfried/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 891
Downloads: 338
Download Rank: 42,394

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.547 seconds