|
||||
|
||||
Bikinis and Efficient Trespass LawJohn MartinezUniversity of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law March 1, 2013 Abstract: On Valentine’s Day 2013, a mother and her two daughters walked into a Barnes & Noble bookstore and put sticky notes strategically on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue featuring Kate Upton in a skimpy bikini. Current trespass law at times emphasizes that a mere physical intrusion suffices. Under that “right to exclude” approach, Barnes & Noble could easily prove that a trespass had occurred. At other times, however, trespass law focuses on the “right to use,” and instead seeks to determine whether any given intrusion interferes with the present beneficial use of the landowner’s premises. Using economic efficiency analysis, this article suggests that the right to exclude approach leads to fewer transaction costs and therefore is the economically efficient - and therefore preferable - legal rule.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 9 Keywords: Trespass, Law & Economics, Economic Efficiency, Transaction Costs, Right to Exclude, Right to Use, Property Law JEL Classification: A10, B40, K00, K10, K11, K13, K19, K40, K41, K49 working papers seriesDate posted: March 3, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds