Footnotes (38)



Bikinis and Efficient Trespass Law

John Martinez

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

March 1, 2013

2013 Utah Law Review OnLaw 290

On Valentine’s Day 2013, a mother and her two daughters walked into a Barnes & Noble bookstore and put sticky notes strategically on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue featuring Kate Upton in a skimpy bikini. Current trespass law at times emphasizes that a mere physical intrusion suffices. Under that “right to exclude” approach, Barnes & Noble could easily prove that a trespass had occurred. At other times, however, trespass law focuses on the “right to use,” and instead seeks to determine whether any given intrusion interferes with the present beneficial use of the landowner’s premises. Using economic efficiency analysis, this article suggests that the right to exclude approach leads to fewer transaction costs and therefore is the economically efficient - and therefore preferable - legal rule.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Trespass, Law & Economics, Economic Efficiency, Transaction Costs, Right to Exclude, Right to Use, Property Law

JEL Classification: A10, B40, K00, K10, K11, K13, K19, K40, K41, K49

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2013 ; Last revised: October 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Martinez, John, Bikinis and Efficient Trespass Law (March 1, 2013). 2013 Utah Law Review OnLaw 290. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2227127 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2227127

Contact Information

John Martinez (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 254
Downloads: 21
Footnotes:  38

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds