Revenge of the Clerks: MERS Confronts County Clerk and Qui Tam Lawsuits
Dustin A. Zacks
King, Nieves & Zacks PLLC
Banking & Financial Services Policy Report, Vol. 32, No. 1, January 2013
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) has faced unceasing controversy from litigators and scholars for its role in foreclosures, its effect on public records transparency, and its role in the housing bubble. While scholarly accounts have described the challenges MERS has faced in foreclosure and bankruptcy courts, this essay seeks to examine the most recent burgeoning challenge to MERS' manner of business: county clerk and qui tam lawsuits.
All around the nation, county clerks and qui tam litigants have begun to file lawsuits against MERS, alleging a number of claims, including that (1) MERS violated state laws requiring assignments to be recorded; (2) MERS used deceptive language to avoid recording laws; and (3) MERS has been unjustfully enriched by depriving county clerks of recording fee revenue. Ultimately, the essay finds that most courts have rejected these claims against MERS, but that such lawsuits remain an expensive risk to MERS.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: foreclosure, mortgage, housing crisis, housing bubble, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, MERS, lendingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 3, 2013 ; Last revised: March 17, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds