Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2231314
 
 

Footnotes (208)



 


 



The Importance of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Financial Regulation


Paul Rose


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

Christopher J. Walker


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

March 10, 2013

Report for U.S. Chamber of Commerce; Law and Capital Markets @ Ohio State, March 2013
Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 208

Abstract:     
This report reviews the role, history, and application of cost-benefit analysis in rulemaking by financial services regulators.

For more than three decades — under both Democratic and Republican administrations — cost-benefit analysis has been a fundamental tool of effective regulation. There has been strong bipartisan support for ensuring regulators maximize the benefits of proposed regulations while implementing them in the most cost-effective manner possible. In short, it is both the right thing to do and the required thing to do.

Through the use of cost-benefit analysis in financial services regulation, regulators can determine if their proposals will actually work to solve the problem they are seeking to address. Basing regulations on the best available data is not a legal “hurdle” for regulators to overcome as they draft rules, as some have described it, but rather a fundamental building block to ensure regulations work as intended.

Not only do history and policy justify the use of cost-benefit analysis in financial regulation, but the law requires its use. In a trio of decisions culminating in its much-publicized 2011 decision in Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. SEC, the D.C. Circuit has interpreted the statutes governing the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to require the agency to consider the costs and benefits of a proposed regulation. Thus, the SEC’s failure to adequately conduct cost-benefit analysis, the D.C. Circuit has held, violates the Administrative Procedure Act. These judicial decisions have supporters as well as critics. However, the SEC’s response is telling: the SEC did not seek further judicial review, but instead issued a guidance memorandum in March 2012 that embraced virtually all of the instructions the D.C. Circuit had provided in its decisions. It remains to be seen whether the SEC will put its new guidance memorandum into practice.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) only elevates the importance of cost-benefit analysis in financial regulation. By requiring nearly 400 rulemakings spread across more than 20 regulatory agencies, implementing Dodd-Frank is an unprecedented challenge for both regulators and regulated entities. The scale and scope of regulations have made it even more important, despite the short deadlines, for regulators to ensure they adequately consider the effectiveness and consequences of their proposals.

Accordingly, we recommend that all financial services regulators should follow similar protocols found in the SEC guidance memorandum and apply rigorous cost-benefit analysis to improve rulemaking and put in place more effective regulations. These steps also promote good government and improve democratic accountability.

There is widespread agreement that ineffective and outdated financial regulation contributed to the financial crisis. As regulators seek to address that, they must take every reasonable step to ensure that their proposals work. This starts with grounding all proposals in an economic analysis to better achieve the desired benefits and better understand the possible consequences and costs that may result from their actions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: administrative law, financial regulation, cost-benefit analysis

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2013 ; Last revised: June 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Rose, Paul and Walker, Christopher J., The Importance of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Financial Regulation (March 10, 2013). Report for U.S. Chamber of Commerce; Law and Capital Markets @ Ohio State, March 2013; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 208. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2231314

Contact Information

Paul Rose
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
Christopher Jay Walker (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-292-2631 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/faculty/professor/christopher-j-walker/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,032
Downloads: 367
Download Rank: 44,757
Footnotes:  208

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds