Abstract

 


 



Congress Underestimated: The Case of the World Bank


Kristina Daugirdas


University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Law School

March 11, 2013

The American Journal of International Law (Forthcoming)
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 323

Abstract:     
Using the World Bank as a case study, this Article casts doubt on the empirical foundation for the claim that international organizations undermine democracy by undermining legislatures. The Article suggests, moreover, that the conventional wisdom about foreign affairs dominance in foreign affairs may be overstated — especially outside the context of wars and crises. Over the past forty years, Congress has undertaken persistent, sometimes parochial, and often successful efforts to shape day-to-day U.S. participation in a key international organization. Some of Congress’s methods for doing so may contravene constitutional limits on its authority — but the executive branch’s arguments that they do have not held Congress back.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: foreign affairs, congress, world bank

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2013 ; Last revised: April 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Daugirdas, Kristina, Congress Underestimated: The Case of the World Bank (March 11, 2013). The American Journal of International Law (Forthcoming); U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 323. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2231503

Contact Information

Kristina Daugirdas (Contact Author)
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 143
Downloads: 31

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.703 seconds