Rethinking the Use of Community Supervision

Cecelia M. Klingele

University of Wisconsin Law School

March 12, 2013

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, No. 4, 2013
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1220

Community supervision, whether in the form of probation or post-release supervision, is ordinarily framed as an alternative to incarceration. For this reason, legal reformers intent on reducing America's disproportionately high incarceration rates often urge lawmakers to expand the use of community supervision, confident that diverting offenders to the community will significantly reduce over-reliance on incarceration. Yet, on any given day, a significant percentage of new prisoners arrive at the prison gates not as a result of sentencing for a new crime, but because they have been revoked from probation or parole. It is therefore fair to say that in many cases community supervision is not an alternative to imprisonment, but only a delayed form of it. This Article examines the reasons why community supervision so often fails, and challenges popular assumptions about the role community supervision should play in efforts to reduce over-reliance on imprisonment. While probation and post-release supervision serve important purposes in many cases, they are often imposed on the wrong people, and executed in ways that predictably lead to revocation. To decrease the overuse of imprisonment, sentencing and correctional practices should therefore limit, rather than expand, the use of community supervision in three important ways. First, terms of community supervision should be imposed in fewer cases, with alternatives ranging from fines to unconditional discharge to short jail terms imposed instead. Second, conditions of probation and post-release supervision should be imposed sparingly, and only when they directly correspond to a risk of re-offense. Finally, terms of community supervision should be limited in duration, extending only long enough to facilitate a period of structured re-integration after sentencing or following a term of incarceration.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: probation, parole, community supervision, mass incarceration, imprisionment, sentencing, revocation

JEL Classification: K14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 12, 2013 ; Last revised: January 22, 2014

Suggested Citation

Klingele, Cecelia M., Rethinking the Use of Community Supervision (March 12, 2013). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, No. 4, 2013; Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1220. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2232078 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2232078

Contact Information

Cecelia M. Klingele (Contact Author)
University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )
975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States
608-890-3258 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,932
Downloads: 405
Download Rank: 52,185

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds