The Missing Word in Lawrence v. Texas
CUNY School of Law
March 13, 2004
Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, 2004
There are many satisfying words in Lawrence v. Texas. Equality and Liberty. Privacy and History. Even a few references to “Lesbian.” What could be missing? An apology. Something like “sorry” or a mention of “remorse.”
The Court stated that, “Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. Hardwick should be and now is overruled.” For some, this may have read as an apology. It may be an admittance of error, but it was not the apology that sexual minorities deserve. We deserve an apology for the seventeen years of grief, pain, and death caused by Bowers v. Hardwick, which the Court now admits has always been wrong.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 16, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds