Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2232928
 


 



The Missing Word in Lawrence v. Texas


Ruthann Robson


CUNY School of Law

March 13, 2004

Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, 2004

Abstract:     
There are many satisfying words in Lawrence v. Texas. Equality and Liberty. Privacy and History. Even a few references to “Lesbian.” What could be missing? An apology. Something like “sorry” or a mention of “remorse.”

The Court stated that, “Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. Hardwick should be and now is overruled.” For some, this may have read as an apology. It may be an admittance of error, but it was not the apology that sexual minorities deserve. We deserve an apology for the seventeen years of grief, pain, and death caused by Bowers v. Hardwick, which the Court now admits has always been wrong.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 16, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Robson, Ruthann, The Missing Word in Lawrence v. Texas (March 13, 2004). Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 10, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2232928

Contact Information

Ruthann Robson (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 170
Downloads: 16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds