Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2233350
 


 



Passive-Aggressive Investments: Minority Shareholdings and Competition Law


Gian Diego Pini


University of Milan - Department of Public, Civil Procedure, International and European Law

September 3, 2012

European Business Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2012

Abstract:     
Minority share acquisitions between competitors have been mistakenly considered of concern only in case they result in a change of control.

First the economic theory, closely followed by courts and doctrine, explained and demonstrated that even the acquisition of non-controlling shareholdings may distort competition and requires a close scrutiny by competition authorities.

This article analyzes the impact of minority shareholdings on the incentives of rival firms and ascertains whether the authorities are provided with adequate tools to investigate and address the potential anticompetitive effects.

The results of the economic theory are the starting point to assess whether the legal treatment of minority shareholdings under the EU and US antitrust systems is appropriate and adequate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 151

Keywords: minority shareholdings, minority, interests, partial, ownership, competition, antitrust, merger, acquisition, non-controlling, anticompetitive, EU, US, Commission, Clayton, Sherman, 101, 102, gap, interlocking, interlocks, interlocking directorates

JEL Classification: K21, K42


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 16, 2013 ; Last revised: January 26, 2015

Suggested Citation

Pini, Gian Diego, Passive-Aggressive Investments: Minority Shareholdings and Competition Law (September 3, 2012). European Business Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2233350

Contact Information

Gian Diego Pini (Contact Author)
University of Milan - Department of Public, Civil Procedure, International and European Law ( email )
Via Festa del Perdono 7
Milano, Milano 20121
Italy
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 876
Downloads: 34
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds