The Interpretation-Construction Distinction in Patent Law
George Mason University School of Law; Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law
Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown University Law Center
Yale Law Journal, Volume 123, 2013, pp. 530-614
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 13-023
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-69
The ambiguity of claim language is generally considered to be the most important problem in patent law today. Linguistic ambiguity is believed to cause tremendous uncertainty about patent rights. Scholars and judges have accordingly devoted enormous attention to developing better linguistic tools to help courts understand patent claims.
In this Article, we explain why this diagnosis is fundamentally wrong. Claims are not often ambiguous, and linguistic ambiguity is not a major cause of the uncertainty in patent law today. We shall explain what really causes the uncertainty in patent rights, how the erroneous diagnosis of linguistic ambiguity has led the literature off-track, and what will get us back on track to solving the uncertainty problem.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 85
Keywords: patent claims, claim construction, claim interpretation
JEL Classification: O34
Date posted: March 16, 2013 ; Last revised: January 1, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds